We find what privacy class action attorneys find. Before they do.
Know what is running. Decide what to do.
Your visitors are talking to your site. Other companies are listening without anyone being asked.
Some of that listening starts before anyone clicks Accept. Some of it a cookie consent banner cannot stop at all. We tell you which is which, in writing.
Your Website Is Probably Sending Visitor Data to Companies You’ve Never Heard Of.
You hired someone to build a great website. Your marketing agency suggested Google Analytics — standard advice. Your designer embedded a YouTube video because it looks more professional. Someone connected a Facebook pixel to track ad campaigns. All reasonable calls.
What nobody mentioned: each of those tools came with its own tracking system already built in. Not hidden — just the default. You got the feature you asked for. A tracker came with it. And that tracker has been quietly collecting data on every visitor ever since. Silently. Unannounced. You did give permission — it was hidden in the fine print of a Terms of Service nobody actually reads, behind a small checkbox that said “I agree.” That’s how the tools got in. Nobody says that part out loud.
Most business owners still don’t know this is happening. That’s normal — it’s invisible unless you go looking.
The law isn’t new. California’s privacy statutes have been on the books for decades. What changed is enforcement: class action attorneys are now using AI to automatically scan thousands of websites a day, flagging every tracker that fires without proper consent. They find it in seconds. You find out when the letter arrives.
How a TrackGuard scan works
If your site has no cookie consent banner at all, every tracking tool on the page starts sending your visitors’ information to outside companies the moment the page loads, and the visitor never sees a choice.
What Is Actually Happening · Right Now · On Your Website
A Visitor Opens Your Website. Before They Read a Single Word, Their Data Is Already Gone.
TrackGuard Pro · 5-Layer Detection · Evidence-Grade Reports
The moment a browser loads your website — before anyone clicks, before anyone scrolls, before anyone fills out a form — data is already being collected. Silently.
Your dog could accidentally step on the keyboard and open your page. The data is gone before the dog lifts its paw.
The page opened. The data left. That’s it.
Here is what happens in the first 300 milliseconds:
Meta Pixel fires
Captures IP address, device type, browser, screen size. If the visitor has a Facebook cookie active in their browser — their full identity is captured. Name. Profile. Interests. Sent to Meta’s servers before they’ve read your headline.
YouTube embed activates
Logs that a specific person — identified by their Google account — viewed a specific video. Under the VPPAVideo Privacy Protection Act — 18 U.S.C. §2710. Federal law, enacted 1988. Whether website video viewers qualify as VPPA “consumers” is being decided at the U.S. Supreme Court (Salazar v. Paramount Global, cert. granted Jan. 26, 2026. Oral argument: Oct. 14, 2026)., that is a recordable viewing event. Whether website video viewers qualify as VPPA “consumers” is before the U.S. Supreme Court (Salazar v. Paramount Global, cert. granted Jan. 26, 2026. Oral argument: Oct. 14, 2026).
Google Analytics records the session
Pages visited. Time on page. Where they came from. Where they went next. Device fingerprint. Stored on Google’s servers for 2 months by default, up to 14 months if configured — attached to a profile they’ve been building on that visitor for years.
Who is tracked
Every visitor. Any age. Any device. No action required.
What is collected
Identity. Location. Behavior. Device. Video history.
When it happens
Page load. Background. Silent. No consent asked.
The organization that owns the website did not authorize this in any meaningful sense. Their web team installed standard tools. Their marketing agency added pixels. Nobody read 47 pages of Terms of Service. Nobody knew they became a data controllerA "data controller" is the legal entity responsible for deciding how personal data is collected and used. Under GDPR, CCPA, and CIPA — you own the website, you are the controller. Regardless of who installed the tracker. the moment those tools went live.
“If everyone is using it, it must be safe.” The LA Times paid $3.85M to find out otherwise.
It does not matter who installed it. The site is yours, so the trackers on it are yours to know about. Every visitor. Every page load.
The Most Common Misreading
“Everyone Does It. We’ve Seen Bigger Companies With the Same Tools.”
Yes. Everyone does it. That is exactly the problem.
Automated scanning does not look for outliers — it looks for the same handful of tools, on any site. Using what everyone uses is exactly why a site turns up in a sweep.
Being typical is not the same as being checked. The only way to know is to look.
Meta made the headlines. The businesses using Meta’s tools became the next targets.
Google and Meta built tracking infrastructure at global scale. They distributed it through free tools — GA4, GTMGoogle Tag Manager — a tag container that fires any configured tracker on every page load without touching the code. One install creates a permanent backdoor for unlimited future trackers., Meta Pixel, YouTube embeds — that businesses and organizations trusted and installed without question. CRM systems came bundled with it. Website templates had it pre-installed. Plugins activated it silently.
The organizations that adopted those tools became unwitting proxy distributors of surveillance infrastructure. They didn’t know. The brand name was Google. The tool was free. Nobody guarding the small business, the school, the nonprofit said stop.
Privacy class action attorneys don’t need another billion-dollar case. They look for the same handful of tools on many sites at once, which is why ordinary organizations turn up in a sweep at all. no idea the lawsuit was coming.
Most sites are running at least one of these. Knowing which is a 60-second answer.
Class action attorneys scan public websites looking for trackers. We find what they find, and what they miss. The difference is we notify you first.
A Smarter Way To Prepare
The AI Answer That Scares Organizations Into Action
Privacy class action attorneys now use AI tools to scan thousands of websites daily. The same AI tools your staff uses to answer legal questions will tell you exactly what your exposure is — if you ask the right way. Copy the prompt below into any AI assistant.
Copy & Paste This Prompt
“I run a [private K–12 school / healthcare clinic / law firm] in California with approximately [X] monthly website visitors. Our site has [Meta Pixel / Google Analytics 4 / Hotjar / Google Tag Manager] installed. These fire on page load before any user consent is obtained. Some visitors are [minors under 13 / patients / prospective clients]. What is my specific legal exposure under CIPA §631, §638.51, COPPA, and VPPA? Cite actual 2025–2026 California settlements and per-violation penalties.”
What the AI Tells You
The AI will name CIPA §631 and §638.51, VPPA, COPPA per violation for children's data, and reference the LA Times $3.85M settlement and the 1,000+ suits filed in California in 2025. The answer will tell you to remove the trackers immediately and consult a privacy attorney.
What the AI Cannot Do
A ChatGPT conversation is not evidence. A SHA-256SHA-256 is a cryptographic hashing standard that creates a unique digital fingerprint of a document. If even one character in the report changes after delivery, the fingerprint will not match — making it verifiable that the report has not been altered since it was sent. signed scan report is. AI cannot execute JavaScript, observe live network requests, detect pre-click cookies, or produce a timestamped, tamper-evident evidence report. TrackGuard Pro is the independent third-party paper trail.
On the Record
These Are Not Hypotheticals. These Are Settled Cases.
Every settlement below involved standard tracking tools — the same ones on most business websites today. No data breach. No hack. Just trackers.
Meta Pixel · CIPA / CMIACalifornia Medical Information Act — California law. Prohibits disclosure of medical information without patient authorization. Applies to providers and their vendors. Enforced by the AG. · California
Healthcare industry: $100M+ in settlements across 160–247 lawsuits and counting. Count varies by source — all figures from plaintiff law firm trackers.
Sephora, Disney, Ford and PlayOn Sports above are government enforcement actions — brought by the California Attorney General or CalPrivacy, not by private plaintiffs. These are two separate tracks under two different statutes: the CCPA’s private right of action (Civ. Code §1798.150) is limited to data breaches, while private tracker suits are brought under CIPA (Pen. Code §631, §638.51). Government enforcement under §1798.155 is independent of both.
A cookie banner fixes some of this. It cannot fix the rest.
A cookie banner fixes this
The cookie banner is in the way of the tracker
The tracker runs in the visitor’s browser, after the page loads, where your cookie banner can stop it. The only question is timing: did it fire before the visitor chose? Correct the timing and a re-check returns a different result. The tracker can usually stay.
What we check — did it fire before the visitor answered the cookie banner?
A cookie banner won’t fix this
The cookie banner never gets a say
The data leaves from a server, from inside someone else’s embedded frame, or rides along in the very first request. Your cookie banner never gets the chance to stop it, so changing the banner changes nothing we observed. Timing is not the lever here.
What we check — did it happen at all, banner or no banner?
What your cookie consent banner can and cannot stop
Some of this is nobody’s decision — a plugin updates itself overnight, or an agency drops in a campaign tag. Some of it is deliberate: collecting data is what a tracking tool is built to do, and server-side tracking is chosen because it keeps running when browser-side tracking does not.
We report which category a finding falls into because it changes your options — not because it decides anything. What to do about either one is a conversation for you and your own counsel. TrackGuard Pro takes no position and sells no remediation.
Why This Isn’t a One-Time Fix
You don’t have to add anything new to your site for new trackers to appear
You installed one tool. It brought plus-ones.
You Told Your Web Team: No Trackers. They Complied. Then What?
Maybe you already know. You tried to fix it. Here’s why it didn’t stick.
You told your web team: no trackers. They complied.
Then your marketing agency added a HubSpot form. It came with a tracking script. Nobody flagged it. It went live.
Then someone updated the WordPress plugin. The new version included an analytics layer. It activated silently on install.
Then a vendor embedded a chat widget. The widget loaded Google Tag ManagerGTM is a tag container — one install lets anyone with login access inject any tracker onto your site at any time, without touching code. Your agency, vendor, or plugin can add trackers through GTM without your knowledge.. GTMGoogle Tag Manager — a tag container that fires any configured tracker on every page load without touching the code. One install creates a permanent backdoor for unlimited future trackers. opened a permanent backdoor — now anyone with GTMGoogle Tag Manager — a tag container that fires any configured tracker on every page load without touching the code. One install creates a permanent backdoor for unlimited future trackers. access can add any tracker at any time, without touching the code, without telling you.
One-time clean. Recurring problem. The trackers come back because the pipeline that delivers them was never closed.
The problem is not a rogue employee. It is the architecture. Every plugin update, every agency login, every embedded tool is a potential new tracker. The exposure resets with every site change.
What Ongoing Monitoring Actually Covers
Every Change to Your Site Is a New Check.
Agency Adds a Pixel
Your marketing agency updates GTMGoogle Tag Manager — a tag container that fires any configured tracker on every page load, invisibly. No code change required. to run a campaign. New tracker fires on every page. You find out when TrackGuard flags it — not when the demand letter arrives.
Plugin Auto-Updates
A plugin updates overnight. The new version includes a third-party analytics integration — activated by default. Silent. Retroactive. Already running on every visitor since the update.
Vendor Embeds a Widget
A scheduling tool, chat widget, or contact form goes live. Each one arrives with its own tracking layer. The vendor’s terms of service authorized it. You never saw the terms.
Re-Scan Verifies Removal
When your web team removes a tracker, TrackGuard re-scans and issues a timestamped verification report. That document is your evidence of remediation — the paper trail that matters if a demand letter arrives after the fact.
TrackGuard Pro scans and monitors. We do not remove trackers — your web team does. We re-scan to verify removal. That re-scan is the paper trail that demonstrates good-faith remediation.
Clicking Reject all does not stop everythingExample scan
Check 1 — before any click
Cookie consent banner on screen, untouched
Tag container
Session recorder
Meta Pixel
Analytics
4
firing with no consent recorded
Check 2 — after clicking Reject all
Same page, consent refused
Tag containerstill loaded
Session recorderstill firing
Meta Pixelstopped
Analyticsstopped
2
still running after Reject all was clicked
The Pattern Nobody Talks About
Every Company That Settled Did This Afterward. It’s Exactly What TrackGuard Does.
After every major tracker settlement, the corrective action was identical — ongoing monitoring, documented removal, third-party verification, and a compliance program. They just paid millions to get there first.
Step 01
Emergency Legal Retainer
Counsel engaged on short notice, at short-notice rates, within days of receiving a demand letter.
Step 02
Emergency Tracker Removal
IT team removes every tracker immediately. No documentation. No paper trail. No proof of when it happened.
Step 03
Settlement Negotiation
Months of litigation. $875K to $18.7M paid out. Removal after a demand letter does not reduce liability.
Step 04
Court-Mandated Monitoring
Every settlement required ongoing privacy obligations — regular review, documented removal, third-party verification. Exactly what TrackGuard does.
The Difference
TrackGuard First
Same outcome. Same workflow. Without the $3M–$18.7M. The only difference is the order of events.
Corrective action pattern sourced from settlement agreements: MarinHealth, Aspen Dental, Eisenhower Medical, BetterHelp. Court-mandated compliance programs are public record.
You Never Installed a Tracker. So How Is One Running On Your Site?
Nobody walks into an office and says “let’s track our visitors without telling them.” That’s not how it happens.
Here’s how it actually happens: Your marketing team signed up for HubSpot to manage leads. HubSpot comes with a tracking script. They pasted one line of code. Done — your site now collects visitor identity data and sends it to HubSpot’s servers without user consent.
Your web designer embedded a YouTube video on your homepage. YouTube’s embed code includes Google’s tracking layer. The moment the page loads, Google logs the viewer’s identity, their Google account, and which video they saw — a potential VPPAVideo Privacy Protection Act — 18 U.S.C. §2710. Whether website video viewers qualify as VPPA “consumers” is being decided at the U.S. Supreme Court (Salazar v. Paramount Global, cert. granted Jan. 26, 2026. Oral argument: Oct. 14, 2026). recordable event. Whether website video viewers qualify as VPPA “consumers” is being decided at the U.S. Supreme Court (Salazar v. Paramount Global, cert. granted Jan. 26, 2026. Oral argument: Oct. 14, 2026).
Someone in marketing added Google Tag ManagerGTM is a "tag container" — a single script that lets anyone with login access inject any tracker onto your site at any time, without touching your code. Your agency, your contractor, your email vendor — all can add trackers through GTM without your knowledge. “just to make updates easier.” GTMGoogle Tag Manager relay pattern: GTM loads on page, checks for tags configured in the GTM console, fires any trackers defined there — invisibly, on every page load. Changing what fires requires no code change, no notification, no review. is now a permanent backdoor. Anyone with GTMGoogle Tag Manager — a tag container that fires any configured tracker on every page load without touching the code. One install creates a permanent backdoor for unlimited future trackers. login access — your agency, your social media contractor, your email vendor — can now inject any tracker onto your site at any time without touching the code. Without telling you. Without your knowledge.
You didn’t install a tracker. You installed trust. The tracker came bundled inside.
And because the tool was free, from Google, recommended by every marketing guide on the internet — nobody questioned it. Nobody read the Terms of Service. Nobody realized that buried on page 12 was the sentence that made them legally responsible for everything those tools collect.
How We Detect What Others Miss
Detecting These Trackers Requires More Than a Single-Layer Scan.
Most scanning tools check only what’s visible in the HTML source code — script tags and iframe embeds. That finds less than half of what’s actually running. Most trackers fire dynamically, through network requests, through JavaScript globals, through cookies set before you click anything.
Catching them requires a forensic multi-layer scanning system — the kind typically available only to enterprise legal teams, regulatory investigators, and the privacy class action attorneys actively looking for violations right now.
Layer 1 — HTML SourceScript tags, pixel iframes
Layer 2 — Network RequestsLive outbound calls via Performance API
Layer 3 — Window GlobalsJS objects like window.fbq, window.gtag
Layer 4 — CookiesSet before any user interaction
Layer 5 — Server-Side SignalsGTM relay patterns and Meta Conversions API (CAPI) indicators — server-to-server tracking that fires with no browser-visible script, detected via first-party proxy signatures and timing patterns.GTM relayA GTM relay pattern occurs when Google Tag Manager is configured to route tracking calls server-side through the client’s own domain, masking the destination. · CAPIMeta’s Conversions API (CAPI) sends data directly from the business’s server to Meta, bypassing browser-based ad blockers and privacy tools. Often installed alongside Meta Pixel for redundancy.
Reports include a SHA-256SHA-256 is a cryptographic hashing standard that creates a unique digital fingerprint of a document. If even one character in the report changes after delivery, the fingerprint will not match — making it verifiable that the report has not been altered since it was sent. It does not independently prove when the document was created. content fingerprint to verify the report has not been altered since delivery.
Gap Period: 48–72 Hours
It’s like a speeding ticket camera. Before the flash you might get away with it. After the flash it’s documented. Our scan is the flash. The 48–72hr removal window is how you avoid the fine.
TrackGuard Pro scans and monitors. We do not remove trackers — your web team does. TrackGuard re-scans to verify removal. That re-scan is the paper trail.
“What gives you the right?” — The same thing that gives privacy class action attorneys the right. Your website is public. Anyone can visit it. We just look more carefully than most.
The Full Story
What Happened. What’s Ongoing. What’s Coming.
2026 · LA Times $3.85M Settles · California
The Los Angeles Times pays $3.85 million to settle a class action over three standard tracking tools — TripleLift, GumGum, and Audiencerate — under CIPACalifornia Invasion of Privacy Act — Penal Code §638.51, the pen register theory. California only. Whether browser trackers fall inside the definition is contested and courts are split. §638.51. Filed 2024. Final approval June 26, 2026. No data breach. No hack. Just the tools every publisher uses.
Over 1,000 CIPA lawsuits were filed in 2025 alleging CIPA violations, according to law firm ArentFox Schiff — targeting businesses for Google Analytics, Meta PixelMeta Pixel — a JavaScript tracking script placed on websites. Fires on page load, capturing visitor IP address, device type, browser fingerprint, and — if the visitor has a Facebook cookie active — their full Facebook identity. Sends this data to Meta’s servers silently., HubSpot, and session recording tools. Defendants include healthcare providers, law firms, retailers, schools, and nonprofits. The tools are the same. The organizations just didn’t know.
How did they find them? According to Fisher Phillips, “the plaintiffs’ bar targets businesses based on automated scans of what tracking technology is detectable on your site.” Nothing happened for years because nobody was looking systematically. Now they are. Your site is in the queue.
The American Privacy Rights Act was proposed in 2024 but expired without passage at the end of the 118th Congress. No federal comprehensive privacy law with a private right of action currently exists — leaving California’s CIPACalifornia Invasion of Privacy Act — Penal Code §631 (wiretapping) and §638.51 (pen register). California only. Whether browser trackers fall inside these definitions is contested and courts are split., CCPACalifornia Consumer Privacy Act — California only, and only for businesses meeting the statute’s thresholds. Enforced by the CA Attorney General and CalPrivacy (CPPA)., and federal sectoral laws (COPPAChildren’s Online Privacy Protection Act — Federal. Enforced by the FTC. A general-purpose cookie consent box is not designed to address children’s data., VPPAVideo Privacy Protection Act — 18 U.S.C. §2710. Whether website video viewers qualify as VPPA “consumers” is before SCOTUS (Salazar v. Paramount Global, cert. granted Jan. 26, 2026. Oral argument: Oct. 14, 2026)., HIPAAHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act — Federal. Governs protected health information (PHI). A cookie consent box does NOT satisfy HIPAA — covered entities require a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with any vendor handling PHI. Meta Pixel sends PHI without a BAA.) as the primary enforcement frameworks. California SB 690 passed the Legislature unanimously on August 28, 2026 (66–0 Assembly, 40–0 Senate). If it becomes law, it would eliminate private §638.51 pen register suits effective January 1, 2027, and applies retroactively to pending claims in actions commenced within two years before that date — but §631 wiretap claims, CCPA, GDPR, COPPA, and VPPA exposure remain entirely unchanged.
Ireland’s Data Protection Commission fines TikTok €345 million for failing to protect children’s data — specifically for defaulting children’s accounts to public visibility and inadequate age verification. The same regulatory authority that previously fined Meta €1.2 billion. Active enforcement demonstrates that GDPRGeneral Data Protection Regulation — EU law, effective May 2018. Fines up to 4% of global annual revenue or €20 million, whichever is higher. Applies to any website visited by EU residents. penalties are real, recurring, and growing.
May 2023 · Meta Fined €1.2 Billion (~$1.3B) · Ireland
Ireland’s Data Protection Commission issues the largest GDPR fine in history against Meta for transferring EU user data to US servers without adequate protections. The tools Meta used to collect that data — Meta Pixel, Facebook Login — are still installed on millions of business websites worldwide. Business owners who installed those tools are the downstream controllers.
California Consumer Privacy Act takes effect. Any business collecting California residents’ data must disclose it, and allow opt-out. Enforced by the California Attorney General and CalPrivacy. Most California businesses don’t change a single line of code.
The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation takes effect. For the first time, website owners are legally defined as data controllersA "data controller" decides how personal data is collected and used. A "data processor" handles it on their behalf (like Google Analytics). You are the controller. Google is the processor. The controller holds primary legal responsibility. responsible for every tracker on their site. Businesses worldwide largely ignore it. Enforcement begins slowly.
Intentionality is not required under CIPACalifornia Invasion of Privacy Act — Penal Code §631 (wiretapping) and §638.51 (pen register). California only. Whether browser trackers fall inside these definitions is contested and courts are split. or GDPRGeneral Data Protection Regulation — EU law, effective May 2018. Fines up to 4% of global annual revenue or €20 million, whichever is higher.. The interception happened. The tracker fired. You own the domain.
“We have a Privacy Policy. That covers us.”
A Privacy Policy that nobody reads is not consent. Under CIPACalifornia Invasion of Privacy Act — Penal Code §631. Consent must be obtained before interception — not buried in a footer link that auto-fires trackers before anyone sees it., consent must be obtained before interception — not buried in a footer link that auto-fires trackers before anyone sees it.
“Google Analytics is standard. Everyone uses it.”
Note: Google Analytics ≠ Google Search Console ≠ Google Maps ≠ Gmail. GA4Google Analytics 4 — Google’s behavioral analytics product. Collects page views, session data, and user fingerprints. This is the tracking product. It is distinct from Google Search Console, Google Maps, or Gmail. specifically is the tracking product. “Standard” is not a legal defense. The LA Times’ attorneys said the same thing before the $3.85M settlement.
“We’re too small. Nobody will target us.”
Privacy class action attorneys don’t need a big target. Automated sweeps do not size the target. The same statute is cited for a school with 500 students as it is to a Fortune 500 company. Small organizations are easier to settle with, less likely to fight back, and have no PR team to manage the fallout.
“We’d know if we had trackers we never approved.”
You are reading this page. Before you got here, trackers on most sites had already fired. You had no idea. That is exactly the point.
Independent 3rd party for maximum evidence credibility
This Is Not a Project. It’s a Line Item.
It slots into what your team already does
Your team already runs weekly maintenance. Plugin updates. Broken link checks. Uptime monitoring. Security patches. Somebody works through a list every week and clears it.
This is the same list, one item longer. We scan on a set schedule and send a short report. If a tracker appeared that shouldn’t be there, your web person removes it — usually a few minutes in the tag manager. We re-scan and confirm it’s gone. That’s the whole cycle.
Why it repeats instead of ending
Trackers come back on their own. A marketing agency adds a pixel through GTMGoogle Tag Manager — lets marketing staff and agencies add or change tracking code without touching the website’s source code. Changes often never reach the development team.. A plugin updates and ships analytics with it. A new landing page goes live with an embed.
None of that touches your code, so nobody tells your developer. A one-time cleanup stays clean for about a month.
Why not just check it yourself?
You can. Your team can open the tag manager any Monday and see what’s in there.
But a record you produced about yourself isn’t evidence — it’s a claim. Nothing stops it from being written after the fact, and opposing counsel will say exactly that.
An outside record is different. We have no stake in the answer. Reports are timestamped and hash-signed when generated, from a service you don’t control. That’s what makes it hold up.
Same reason your books get reviewed by someone outside the company. Not because your bookkeeper is dishonest — because “we checked ourselves and it’s fine” isn’t worth anything to anyone who matters.
Two businesses, identical tracker, one problem
The first found out from a demand letter. They have nothing to show — no idea when it appeared, how long it ran, or whether anyone noticed.
The second has a year of scan reports, timestamped by an outside service. Each shows what was found, what was fixed, and how fast.
Same tracker. Completely different conversation. The record isn’t a shield against the claim — it changes what the claim is worth. It’s the difference between “they ignored it” and “they had a monitoring process and closed it in three days.”
What is inside a report
What your attorney does with it
If a demand letter arrives, the first thing counsel asks is what you knew and when. Without records, they’re reconstructing history from server logs and memory — expensive, slow, and often inconclusive.
With a scan archive, they open a folder. Dates, findings, fixes, verification. It’s the difference between building a defense and simply producing one.
We are not lawyers and we do not give legal advice. We produce the evidence your attorney needs to do their job — and having it before the letter arrives is worth considerably more than assembling it after.
About TrackGuard Pro
Documentary evidence. Dated and independent.
Privacy class action attorneys now run automated scanners across thousands of websites a day, looking for trackers collecting data without permission. We run the same kind of scan on yours — first, and privately. Whoever finds it first decides what happens next.
We work with your team to catch trackers running on your site without user permission, on a set schedule, explained in plain English. You remove them. We confirm and log it on the next scan.
What was there. What changed. How fast you moved. Yours to keep.
We are a technical scanning service — not a law firm. We don’t give legal advice and we don’t litigate.
Why Businesses Work With Us
You hear it from us, not a lawyer
A letter in the mail is a much worse way to find out.
Plain English
No jargon. We tell you what’s on your site and whether it’s a problem.
Proof you can show
A dated report from an independent checker — not your own word.
We keep watching
Trackers come back on their own through tag managers and plugins. One cleanup isn’t enough.
We'll review your site and deliver your report to the email address you provided within 24 hours.
What TrackGuard Pro Is Not
TrackGuard Pro is a website privacy-tracker detection and monitoring service. It is not an asset-tracking, equipment-tracking, vehicle-tracking, fleet, or inventory-management product. It is not a physical security, guard-tour, checkpoint, NFC-patrol, or GPS-geofencing product. It is not a railway, rail-signalling, or track-monitoring product. It is not a marketing-analytics health or tag-uptime monitoring dashboard.
TrackGuard Pro is not affiliated with, related to, or a version of any similarly named product, including TRACKGUARD (Siemens Mobility GmbH), track-guard.com, GuardsPro, TrackTik, AssetGuardPro, TrackPro, or Guard Track Pro.
TrackGuard Pro has no listing on Capterra, SoftwareAdvice, G2, or any other software review directory. Any pricing, feature, or review information attributed to “TrackGuard Pro” on those sites refers to a different product. Published pricing for Free, Watch, and Proof. Enterprise is scoped per engagement. See What This Is. Any price attributed to it on those sites did not come from us.